![]() The indexing could easily start with the most current "create or modfy date" but instead it it re-indexing everything that gets indexed over and over each time, even though the file has not changed. This is an easy feature fix, I hope they see the importance soon.2. one must select each keyword from the drop down, then the next one and so on. So in order to see all the keywords in a resume i.e. Rather than show all keywords highlighted in the results window document (like the rest of the world does), they chose to show only the keyword selected. Great product if they change these 2 major flaws:1. Saving and updating search results work great. Ways to search and organize results are nicely execited. Very useful for searching large quantities of resumes in our case. I read that their customer service is rated poorly, but I have NEVER waited more than a day to get something resolved. It's too bad too, since I have been using it for over 10yrs. The license is per computer.Ĭomments: Searching multiple sources is great, and we rely on tools like this, but since they upgraded from version 5 they eliminated showing all the keywords at the same time, so I am looking for alternative products. It also updates regularly and easily.ĭifficult to install and index and this was a long learning curve! A trial is not offered. I do need my entire hard drive to be searched. I could readily set up the specific USB flash drive which needed to be searched. The search findings are presented in date order, and useful search options are offered. The search results are rapid, accurate and comprehensive. I attempted to install Copernic on my second computer, but to my surprise discovered that the license was per computer. This had never happened with Google and the indexing was simple never gave problems. I finally found out that this was my fault, as I had set up the indexing process not entirely correctly. Copernic stopped working every few days and had to be re-indexed. This had been a difficult task with Google Desktop. ![]() It was difficult to set up compared to Google Desktop, but then again, perhaps my computer skills or lack thereof, was the problem! The indexing process was rapid, and I could readily identify the specific USB flash drive which needed to be searched. The cost was reasonable so that was acceptable. The company did not offer a trial, so it had to be purchased and then evaluated. It has many advantages but also challenges. After evaluating several options, I finally selected Copernic and it is now in daily use and works much better than the old Google Desktop. Google Desktop was used to perform that checking task. I run a media monitoring business and it is essential that earlier articles or sections thereof that have appeared in my prior reports are not repeated. Recently, it stopped working and I was forced to look for an alternative desktop search program. ![]() Comments: I had used Google Desktop successfully for many years in my business despite it being discontinued some time ago.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |